• Models
  • Contests
  • Slicer
  • Login
  • Start Here
    thingiverse-iconprintables-iconcults3d-iconmakerworld-iconmyminifactory-icon

    3D GO

    3D ModelsContestsCollectionsSaved ModelsOn a mobile device?

3D GO

Privacy Policy
Dimensional Calibration Tool v9 3D Printer File Image 1
Dimensional Calibration Tool v9 3D Printer File Image 2
Dimensional Calibration Tool v9 3D Printer File Image 3
Dimensional Calibration Tool v9 3D Printer File Image 4
Dimensional Calibration Tool v9 3D Printer File Thumbnail 1
Dimensional Calibration Tool v9 3D Printer File Thumbnail 2
Dimensional Calibration Tool v9 3D Printer File Thumbnail 3
Dimensional Calibration Tool v9 3D Printer File Thumbnail 4

Dimensional Calibration Tool v9

LuckyPants avatarLuckyPants

December 20, 2016

thingiverse-icon
DescriptionCommentsTags

Description

With the Google sheet open, from the File menu there is the option to make a copy in your GDrive. This will give you your own, editable copy

New version of the dimensional calibration tool.

The revised part is easier to measure, and should give more accurate results.
The spreadsheet now considers both scaling error due to shrinkage, as well as radial compensation error (horizontal size adjustment in S3D).

  1. Print the test part using your filament of choice, and slicer settings you intend to use.
  2. Measure and input into the spreadsheet (mine is shared at https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/14Nqzy8B2T4-O4q95d4unt6nQt4gQbnZm_qMQ-7PzV_I/edit?usp=sharing).
  3. Update slicer settings.

The concept is to measure all but the smallest part feature. These larger features will be most affected by errors due to shrinkage, and least affected by errors due to radial compensation errors. The scaling error percentages are populated.

Next, measure the smallest feature. This feature is least affected by shrinkage, and most affected by radial comp errors. The spreadsheet estimates what the error 'should' have been based on the scaling errors found on the larger features, and attributes the difference to radial comp error. This radial error is populated.

Next, the spreadsheet recalculates the scaling errors found on the larger features by 'simulating' that you reprint the part with the radial comp adjusted, then takes an average of these values as the final scaling error for your slicer.

Lastly, at the bottom both the scaling factor to input and the radial shift (called horizontal size compensation in my slicer) are populated. Plug these into your slicer.

If you want it super accurate, you could run 2 iterations of this, but in my case once was good enough to get me to less than 100um over the 150mm part, which I was happy with.

License:

Creative Commons - Attribution

Related Models

#3DBenchy - The jolly 3D printing torture-test by CreativeTools.se preview image

#3DBenchy - The jolly 3D printing torture-test by CreativeTools.se

CreativeTools profile image

CreativeTools

90,944

Stress Free First Layer calibration in less than 5 Minutes to perfection preview image

Stress Free First Layer calibration in less than 5 Minutes to perfection

yahbluez profile image

yahbluez

8,733

Ironing calibration preview image

Ironing calibration

QD3D profile image

QD3D

4,290

All In One 3D Printer test preview image

All In One 3D Printer test

majda107 profile image

majda107

64,524

Bed level test preview image

Bed level test

Prusa Research profile image

Prusa Research

8,443

All In One Calibration Test preview image

All In One Calibration Test

Little Mac Designs profile image

Little Mac Designs

7,619

XYZ 20mm Calibration Cube preview image

XYZ 20mm Calibration Cube

iDig3Dprinting profile image

iDig3Dprinting

50,539

Cali-Dragon preview image

Cali-Dragon

McGybeer profile image

McGybeer

8,409